An observer-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1, single ascending dose study of dengue monoclonal antibody in healthy adults in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Dengue is highly prevalent in Asia and Latin America and has no specific dengue antiviral treatment. A recombinant monoclonal antibody (VIS513) that neutralises all four serotypes of the dengue virus has been developed in India. After confirmation of safety and efficacy in preclinical studies, it was tested in a first-in-human study to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: This was a partially blind (observer-blind), randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1, single ascending dose study in Australia. Participants were dengue naive, healthy adults (aged 18-45 years) with no clinically significant disorders or immunosuppressive conditions. Four dose levels of dengue monoclonal antibody (ie, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, and 12 mg/kg; n=4 for 1 mg/kg and n=10 each for 3 mg/kg, 7 mg/kg, and 12 mg/kg doses) were assessed in a dose-ascending way with a placebo control (n=2 for each dose cohort, total n=6) for each cohort except for 1 mg/kg. Within each cohort, participants were first randomly assigned (1:1) in a sentinel sub-cohort and then randomly assigned (9:1) in an expansion sub-cohort to dengue monoclonal antibody or placebo except for the 1 mg/kg cohort. Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were masked and treatment administrators were not masked. 40 participants received a single intravenous injection or infusion of either dengue monoclonal antibody or placebo over a period of 3 min to 2 h and were followed up until day 85. The primary outcomes were proportion of participants with adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) up to 84 days after dosing whereas the secondary outcomes were to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of dengue monoclonal antibody and to assess the presence of anti-drug antibody (ADA) to dengue monoclonal antibody. All participants were included in the safety analysis and the pharmacokinetic population involved participants receiving dengue monoclonal antibody. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03883620. FINDINGS: Between March 22 and Dec 23, 2019, 40 healthy adults were randomly assigned and all completed the study. There were no SAEs reported. None of the placebo recipients (n=6) reported any adverse events. 31 (91%) of 34 participants receiving dengue monoclonal antibody reported 143 adverse events (1 mg/kg: four [100%] of four participants; 3 mg/kg: ten [100%] of ten participants; 7 mg/kg: seven [70%] of ten participants; 12 mg/kg: ten [100%] of ten participants). Of these 143 adverse events, 80 were treatment-related adverse events in 28 (82%) of 34 participants. Headache (16 [47%] of 34), infusion reaction (11 [32%] of 34), lymphopenia (seven [21%] of 34), fatigue (five [15%] of 34), and pyrexia (four [12%] of 34) were the most common reactions. Infusion reactions were reduced in the 7 mg/kg (two [20%] of ten participants) and 12 mg/kg (three [30%] of ten) cohorts with paracetamol premedication compared with the 3 mg/kg cohort (five [50%] of ten). The majority of adverse events were grade 1 or grade 2 in severity, and resolved completely. Median maximum serum concentrations ranged from 28 µg/mL (1 mg/kg) to 525 µg/mL (12 mg/kg). The median elimination half-life ranged from 775 h (1 mg/kg) to 878 h (12 mg/kg). No ADA against dengue monoclonal antibody was detected. INTERPRETATION: Dengue monoclonal antibody was safe and well tolerated. It showed a dose-proportionate increase in pharmacokinetic exposure. These data support further evaluation of dengue monoclonal antibody in patients with dengue for safety and efficacy. FUNDING: Serum Institute of India.

A Phase 1, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a tetravalent live attenuated dengue vaccine in adults.

BACKGROUND: Dengue fever is an important public health problem, especially in Asia and South America. A tetravalent live attenuated dengue vaccine was manufactured in India after receipt of vaccine strains from NIAID, NIH, USA. METHODS: This was a Phase 1, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study performed in 60 healthy adults of 18 to 45 years. Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive a single subcutaneous injection of either a tetravalent live attenuated dengue vaccine or placebo. Safety was assessed by unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and solicited reactions through 21 days after vaccination and serious adverse events (SAEs) through the entire study period of 180 days. Dengue viremia was assessed at baseline and on day 9, 11 and 13 post-vaccination using a plaque assay. Immunogenicity was assessed using the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) assay using vaccine-matched wild virus serotypes (DENV 1, DENV 2, DENV 3 and DENV 4) at baseline and on 56-, 84- and 180-days post-vaccination. PRNT assay using circulating wild type DENV 1, DENV 2, DENV 3 and DENV 4 were done on day 1 and day 85 for a subset of 31 participants. RESULTS: 60 participants were randomized to receive dengue vaccine (n = 40) or placebo (n = 20). 23 participants (59 %) showed DENV vaccine viremia post- vaccination for any of the four serotypes with majority on day 9 and day 11. At baseline, all participants were naïve by dengue PRNT50 for all four serotypes in both the study groups except for four in the dengue vaccine group and two in the placebo group. On day 57, the GMTs of neutralizing antibodies ranged from 66.76 (95 % CI 36.63, 121.69) to 293.84 (95 % CI 192.25, 449.11) for all four serotypes in the dengue vaccine group. On day 181 though the titers declined, they still remained much higher than the baseline. The titers in the placebo group did not change after vaccination. Seroconversion through day 85 ranged from 79.5 % for DENV 1 to 100 % for DENV2 while in the placebo group, no participant showed seroconversion through day 85. Similar trends were noted when PRNT was done using wild DENV serotypes in both vaccine and placebo groups. Among solicited reactions, injection site erythema, rash, headache, fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia were reported more frequently in the vaccine group than placebo group. All solicited reactions were of grade 1 or grade 2 severity and completely resolved. One unrelated serious adverse event was reported in the vaccine group. CONCLUSION: A single dose of dengue vaccine was safe and well tolerated in adults. The vaccine was highly immunogenic with trivalent or tetravalent seroconversion and seropositivity in most of the participants. The study was funded by Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04035278.

A phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of an mRNA-based RSV prefusion F protein vaccine in healthy younger and older adults.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) causes lower respiratory tract infections that can be severe and sometimes fatal. The risk for severe RSV infection is highest in infants and older adults. A safe and effective RSV vaccine for older adults represents a serious unmet medical need due to higher morbidity and mortality in this age group. In this randomized, partially double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 dose-escalation study, we evaluated the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of an investigational messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine encoding the RSV fusion protein (F) stabilized in the prefusion conformation. The study was conducted in healthy younger adults (ages ≥18 and ≤49 years) and healthy older adults (ages ≥60 and ≤79 years). Participants received mRNA-1777 (V171) or placebo as a single intramuscular dose. For each dose level, three sentinel participants were administered open-label mRNA-1777 (V171). Seventy-two younger adults were randomized and administered 25, 100, or 200 µg mRNA-1777 (V171) or placebo, and 107 older adults were randomized and administered 25, 100, 200 or 300 µg mRNA-1777 (V171) or placebo. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability and secondary objectives included humoral and cell-mediated immunogenicity. All dose levels of mRNA-1777 (V171) were generally well tolerated and no serious adverse events related to the vaccine were reported. Immunization with mRNA-1777 (V171) elicited a humoral immune response as measured by increases in RSV neutralizing antibody titers, serum antibody titers to RSV prefusion F protein, D25 competing antibody titers to RSV prefusion F protein, and cell-mediated immune responses to RSV-F peptides.

Frailty and Co-Prescribing of Potentially Interacting Drugs in New Users of Warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is underutilised in frail older people because of the fear of bleeding complications. Drug interactions are an independent bleeding risk factor. However, the extent to which potential drug interactions are taken into account at warfarin therapy initiation in frail patients is not known. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the use of potentially interacting drugs increasing the bleeding risk before and after warfarin initiation in frail and non-frail patients. METHODS: We conducted an observational study including inpatients aged ≥ 60 years initiated on warfarin in a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, South Australia. Frailty status was assessed with the Reported Edmonton Frail Scale. Medication charts were reviewed before and after warfarin initiation. RESULTS: In total, 151 patients (102 non-frail and 49 frail) were included. Before warfarin initiation, the use of clopidogrel and acetaminophen was more common in frail patients compared with non-frail patients (25.5% vs 10.2%, p = 0.0135, 63.8% vs 35.7% p = 0.0014, respectively). The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 9.2% in non-frail patients and 6.4% in frail patients before warfarin initiation, was completely stopped after warfarin initiation in both groups. The use of antiplatelet drugs decreased from 56.1% in non-frail patients and 66.0 % in frail patients to 12.2% and 14.9%, respectively. Instead, the use of drugs affecting the metabolism of warfarin or vitamin K increased in both groups. No statistically significant difference was seen in the exposure to interacting drugs between study groups after warfarin initiation. Acetaminophen, senna glycosides and cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibiting drugs were the most common interacting drugs at discharge used in 49.0%, 18.4% and 20.4% of non-frail patients and 53.2%, 29.8% and 19.1% of frail patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall frequency of potential drug interactions was moderate and frail patients were not exposed to warfarin drug interactions more often than non-frail patients. Further studies in larger study populations are required to verify these results.

The Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Profile of BT-11, an Oral, Gut-Restricted Lanthionine Synthetase C-Like 2 Agonist Investigational New Drug for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase I Clinical Trial.

BT-11 is a new oral, gut-restricted, first-in-class investigational drug for Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) that targets the lanthionine synthetase C-like 2 (LANCL2) pathway and immunometabolic mechanisms. Oral BT-11 was assessed for safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in normal healthy volunteers (n = 70) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects (n = 70) were randomly assigned to one of five single ascending dose cohorts (up to 100 mg/kg, p.o.) and three multiple ascending dose cohorts [up to 100 mg/kg daily (QD) for seven days, orally]. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting, vital signs, electrocardiogram, hematology, and clinical chemistry. BT-11 did not increase total or gastrointestinal AE rates, as compared with placebo, and no serious adverse events were observed. Oral BT-11 dosing does not result in any clinically significant findings by biochemistry, coagulation, electrocardiogram, hematology, or urinalysis as compared with placebo. Mean fecal concentrations of BT-11 increased linearly with increasing oral doses, with 2.39 mg/g at 7.7 mg/kg on day 7 of the multiple ascending dose (MAD). Analysis of plasma pharmacokinetics indicates that maximum systemic concentrations are approximately 1/6000th of observed concentrations in feces and the distal gastrointestinal tract. Fecal calprotectin levels were lower in BT-11 treated groups as compared to placebo. BT-11 significantly decreases interferon gamma positive (IFNγ+) and tumor necrosis factor alpha positive (TNFα+) cluster of differentiation 4 positive (CD4+) T cells and increases forkhead box P3 positive (FOXP3+) CD4+ T cells in colonic lamina propria mononuclear cells from patients with CD and patients with UC at concentrations of 0.01 µM when treated ex vivo. BT-11 treatment is well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities up to daily oral doses of 100 mg/kg (16 tablets); whereas the efficacious dose is a single tablet (8 mg/kg). Phase II studies in CD and UC patients are ongoing.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Drug Interaction Potential of SPR741, an Intravenous Potentiator, after Single and Multiple Ascending Doses and When Combined with ß-Lactam Antibiotics in Healthy Subjects.

SPR741 is a novel polymyxin B derivative, with minimal intrinsic antibacterial activity and reduced nonclinical nephrotoxicity compared to levels with polymyxin B, that interacts with the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, enhancing penetration of coadministered antibiotics. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SPR741 were evaluated in two studies, after single and multiple intravenous (i.v.) doses in healthy adult subjects and after coadministration with partner antibiotics. In the single and multiple ascending-dose study, SPR741 or placebo was administered as a 1-h infusion at single doses of 5 to 800 mg and in multiple doses of 50 to 600 mg every 8 h (q8h) for 14 days. In the drug-drug interaction study, a single 400-mg i.v. dose of SPR741 was administered alone and in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, and aztreonam. PK parameters for SPR741 and partner antibiotics were determined using noncompartmental analysis. After single doses, a dose-linear and proportional increase in mean maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was observed. At doses of 100 to 800 mg, >50% of the dose was excreted in the urine in the first 4 h postdose. After multiple doses, the mean half-life was 2.2 h on day 1 and up to 14.0 h on day 14, with no evidence of accumulation after 14 days of dosing up to 400 mg. The PK profile of SPR741 and partner antibiotics was unchanged with coadministration. SPR741 was generally well tolerated at doses up to 1,800 mg/day. These data support further clinical development of SPR741 for treating serious infections due to resistant bacteria. (These studies have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifiers NCT03022175 and NCT03376529.).

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability Evaluation of Single and Multiple Doses of GSK3342830 in Healthy Volunteers.

This was a first-time-in-human randomized, double-blind, single-center, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of GSK3342830 after single and repeat intravenous doses in healthy adult subjects (NCT0271424). Sixty-two subjects were enrolled: 48 subjects in part 1 (single dose) and 14 subjects in part 2 (multiple doses). Following single intravenous infusions, total systemic exposure of GSK3342830 was dose proportional over the 250- to 6000-mg dose range evaluated, whereas peak exposure was approximately dose proportional over the dose range. Following repeat intravenous infusions 3 times a day, GSK3342830 showed time invariance with no drug accumulation. Steady state was reached before day 3, and approximately 90% of GSK3342830 was excreted unchanged in urine. All 48 subjects in part 1 (100.0%) completed the study. In part 2, 9 subjects (64.3%) completed the study, and 5 subjects, all receiving GSK3342830, discontinued early (35.7%), 4 after experiencing fever, headache, and malaise, whereas 1 subject met predefined criteria for drug discontinuation because of transaminitis. GSK3342830 demonstrated PK consistent with other cephalosporin-class antibiotics but poor tolerability following multiple doses in healthy volunteers.

Development and validation of the Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE).

BACKGROUND: Residents of aged care facilities use increasingly complex medication regimens. Reducing unnecessary medication regimen complexity (eg, by consolidating the number of administration times or using alternative formulations) may benefit residents and staff. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an implicit tool to facilitate medication regimen simplification in aged care facilities. METHOD: A purposively selected multidisciplinary expert panel used modified nominal group technique to identify and prioritize factors important in determining whether a medication regimen can be simplified. The five prioritized factors were formulated as questions, pilot-tested using non-identifiable medication charts and refined by panel members. The final tool was validated by two clinical pharmacists who independently applied the tool to a random sample of 50 residents of aged care facilities to identify opportunities for medication regimen simplification. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: The Medication Regimen Simplification Guide for Residential Aged CarE (MRS GRACE) was developed as an implicit tool comprising of five questions about 1) the resident; 2) regulatory and safety requirements; 3) drug interactions; 4) formulation; and 5) facility and follow-up considerations. Using MRS GRACE, two pharmacists independently simplified medication regimens for 29/50 and 30/50 residents (Cohen's kappa=0.38, 95% CI 0.12-0.64), respectively. Simplification was possible for all residents with five or more administration times. Changing an administration time comprised 75% of the two pharmacists' recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Using MRS GRACE, two clinical pharmacists independently simplified over half of residents' medication regimens with fair agreement. MRS GRACE is a promising new tool to guide medication regimen simplification in aged care.

Influence of stroke and bleeding risk on prescribing of oral anticoagulants in older inpatients; has the availability of direct oral anticoagulants changed prescribing?

BACKGROUND: Little is known about changes in prescribing practices in Australia since the introduction of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Our objective was to examine if the availability of DOACs has coincided with a change in prescribing of oral anticoagulants in older hospital inpatients with regard to risk factors for stroke and bleeding. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between October 2012 and August 2015 of inpatients aged over 60 years initiated on an oral anticoagulant in a large metropolitan, tertiary referral, public teaching hospital in Australia. Treatment groups were patients who commenced an oral anticoagulant prior to inclusion of DOACs on the formulary and those who commenced after the introduction of DOACs. Subgroup analyses were conducted in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Differences in clinical characteristics and risk for stroke and bleeding were calculated using the CHADS2 and HAS-BLED scores, respectively, were examined. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were included. Inpatients prescribed an oral anticoagulant after the introduction of DOACs were significantly older, a greater proportion were female and more likely to have had a prior stroke. This was associated with a statistically higher CHADS2 score in the post-DOAC group. Similar findings were observed when limiting the sample to patients with AF. Patients with AF who were at greatest likelihood of having a bleeding event were less likely to be treated with a DOAC. CONCLUSION: Since the introduction of the DOACs, patients who may have previously received no therapy or suboptimal treatment were now more likely to be receiving anticoagulation, suggesting an appropriate change in prescribing practice.

CYP2A6 polymorphisms: is there a role for pharmacogenomics in preventing coumarin-induced hepatotoxicity in lymphedema patients?

Lymphedema is a chronic progressive and significantly disabling disease that affects over 150 million people worldwide. Coumarin is an effective pharmacological treatment, but is banned in some countries due to incidences of hepatotoxicity in rats and mice, and the rare finding of similar hepatotoxicity in humans. Cytochrome P450 (CYP)2A6 is the major enzyme involved in metabolizing coumarin to 7-hydroxycoumarin. A reduction in CYP2A6 activity will lead to shunting of coumarin into other metabolic pathways. In particular, coumarin is metabolized by CYP3A4 to form 3-hydroxycoumarin, the major metabolite in mice and rats. It has been shown that an increase in the 3-hydroxycoumarin ratio is associated with an increased production of the significant cytotoxic product o-hydroxyphenylacetylacetaldehyde (o-HPA), suggesting that a shunting of coumarin metabolism away from 7-hydroxylation is the cause of the toxicity. Hence, poor CYP2A6 metabolizers are more likely to metabolize coumarin via the cytotoxic pathway. Identifying these patients, and not treating them with coumarin, may reduce the incidence of toxicity associated with this drug. The technology to do so exists, but more information is required regarding the mechanism of coumarin toxicity.

Pharmacogenomics: its role in re-establishing coumarin as treatment for lymphedema.

Although there remains some significant controversy regarding the use and benefits of coumarin (5,6-benzo-alpha pyrone), it would seem that targeted appropriate and monitored use of the drug does have a significant role in the treatment of lymphedemas. The particular benefits are its cost and ease of administration. Given today's demands for high level investigative clinical trials, it would be virtually impossible to conduct a study large enough to make any significant conclusions about hepatotoxic effects. However, it seems without doubt that the majority of studies conducted thus far suggest that coumarin (and other benzopyrones, i.e., the ruto-sides, which do not have hepatotoxic effects and which are often discussed in aggregate with coumarin) is effective in treating lymphedema, particularly when used in conjunction with complex physical therapy. The use of pharmacogenomics could significantly lower the risk of coumarin-associated hepatotoxicity, by targeting the use of coumarin to those with functional CYP2A6. Further research in this area will be required to re-evaluate the cost- benefit ratio and to determine the potential for the reintroduction of coumarin as a potent treatment for lymphedema. The perceived negative image of coumarin should not be allowed to carry across to the other benzopyrones, as they still confer a significant benefit in the management of lymphedemas.